4D Molecular Therapeutics

FDMT · NASDAQ

$13.10+$0.81 (+6.59%)TodayMarket closed ·
Prev close $12.29

FDMT analyst rating

BuyConsensus of 10 analysts over the last 12 months. 100% rate it a buy.
  • Strong buy0
  • Buy10
  • Hold0
  • Underperform0
  • Sell0

12-month price target · 13 analysts

Average $28.75 (+119.4% upside)

Low
$18.18
Now
$13.10
High
$38.85

Upgrades and downgrades

The latest rating actions, newest first

FDMT analyst upgrades, downgrades and rating actions
FirmDateActionRating
Chardan CapitalOct 6, 2026MaintainsBuy
B of A SecuritiesSep 29, 2026MaintainsBuy
Cantor FitzgeraldSep 14, 2026UpgradeNeutral → Overweight
B. Riley SecuritiesJul 31, 2026InitiatesBuy
HC Wainwright & Co.Jul 20, 2026MaintainsBuy
JefferiesMar 30, 2026InitiatesBuy
HC Wainwright & Co.Mar 20, 2026MaintainsBuy
RBC CapitalMar 19, 2026MaintainsOutperform
Chardan CapitalMar 19, 2026MaintainsBuy
BarclaysJan 28, 2026InitiatesOverweight

The case for and against

Updated Oct 14, 2026

Bull case

4D Molecular Therapeutics is viewed positively because 4D-150 has now shown durable 2-year visual and anatomic control in PRISM, alongside a 78% overall reduction in treatment burden and 87% in recently diagnosed patients versus projected aflibercept use. The safety profile also appears increasingly de-risked, with only 2 of 71 patients experiencing transient mild intraocular inflammation within the first 28 weeks and no new inflammation emerging through 2 years, which supports retinal specialist adoption. With 4FRONT-2 enrollment completed about 4 months ahead of initial projections and a viable path to more than $1B in peak 4D-150 revenue by 2033, the company appears well positioned to translate clinical momentum into meaningful commercial value.

Bear case

4D Molecular Therapeutics is facing a highly uncertain investment case because its gene therapy pipeline remains early-stage while operating in a crowded competitive landscape with traditional development, regulatory, and commercial risks. Although 4D-150 may reduce Eylea injection burden by about 70% over the 52W 4FRONT studies and could appeal to retina specialists, the benefit still appears modest versus broader expectations and may not be enough to offset execution risk. The company also likely needs additional capital to fund ongoing development and commercialization, increasing dilution and financing risk while the thesis depends on unproven candidates achieving meaningful peak revenue in wet AMD and DME.

Information on this page is provided for informational purposes only and is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security. Investing involves risk, including possible loss of principal. Market data is delayed at least 15 minutes and is provided without warranty. Analyst ratings, price targets and company data come from third-party sources. Past performance does not guarantee future results.