Karman Holdings

KRMN · NYSE

$35.03+$1.12 (+3.30%)TodayMarket closed ·
Prev close $33.91

KRMN analyst rating

BuyConsensus of 11 analysts over the last 12 months. 91% rate it a buy.
  • Strong buy0
  • Buy10
  • Hold0
  • Underperform0
  • Sell1

12-month price target · 13 analysts

Average $92.56 (+164.2% upside)

Low
$63.63
Now
$35.03
High
$141.75

Upgrades and downgrades

The latest rating actions, newest first

KRMN analyst upgrades, downgrades and rating actions
FirmDateActionRating
MacquarieOct 16, 2026InitiatesOutperform
BarclaysOct 9, 2026InitiatesOverweight
RBC CapitalSep 28, 2026MaintainsOutperform
GuggenheimSep 15, 2026InitiatesBuy
Truist SecuritiesAug 13, 2026MaintainsBuy
CitigroupAug 10, 2026MaintainsBuy
BWS FinancialAug 10, 2026MaintainsSell
Evercore ISI GroupAug 7, 2026MaintainsOutperform
NeedhamAug 7, 2026MaintainsBuy
Piper SandlerAug 7, 2026MaintainsOverweight

The case for and against

Updated Oct 14, 2026

Bull case

Karman Holdings is viewed positively because its disclosures reinforce durable growth, margin resilience, and improving capital efficiency, including management’s confidence in ~25% organic growth through the end of the decade and sustained ~30% adj. EBITDA margins. The company’s ~95% revenue visibility in 2026, backlog strength, and post-IPO acquisitions done at roughly 10x across 4 transactions support a credible expansion story, while its contract assets plus inventory at 28% of annual revenues in 2Q26 compares favorably with the peer average of 40%. Its exposure to prioritized DoD and space programs, combined with guidance for $15-20M in FCF in 2H26 and a push to improve working capital, suggests a high-quality defense platform with improving cash generation and a strong moat.

Bear case

Karman Holdings is viewed negatively because its weak free cash flow, declining cash balance to $51.7 million, and ongoing working-capital needs suggest that growth is still being financed rather than efficiently converted into cash. Despite a $1.3 billion backlog and a 2.6x B2B in 2Q26, RPO fell sequentially by about $20 million, while heavy dependence on U.S. defense spending, with the three largest customers contributing roughly 47% of revenue, increases revenue concentration risk. The outlook is further pressured by government-contract volatility, CMMC compliance requirements by FY26, and a planned shift toward more cost-plus revenue that could compress gross margins and weaken valuation quality.

Information on this page is provided for informational purposes only and is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security. Investing involves risk, including possible loss of principal. Market data is delayed at least 15 minutes and is provided without warranty. Analyst ratings, price targets and company data come from third-party sources. Past performance does not guarantee future results.