Tenax Therapeutics

TENX · NASDAQ

$1.63−$0.01 (−0.61%)TodayMarket closed ·
Prev close $1.64

TENX analyst rating

BuyConsensus of 8 analysts over the last 12 months. 50% rate it a buy.
  • Strong buy0
  • Buy4
  • Hold4
  • Underperform0
  • Sell0

12-month price target · 10 analysts

Average $9.82 (+502.3% upside)

Low
$4.04
Now
$1.63
High
$36.75

Upgrades and downgrades

The latest rating actions, newest first

TENX analyst upgrades, downgrades and rating actions
FirmDateActionRating
GuggenheimAug 31, 2026DowngradeBuy → Neutral
Chardan CapitalAug 11, 2026DowngradeBuy → Neutral
Canaccord GenuityAug 11, 2026MaintainsBuy
GuggenheimAug 11, 2026MaintainsBuy
Evercore ISI GroupAug 11, 2026DowngradeOutperform → In-Line
William BlairAug 10, 2026DowngradeOutperform → Market Perform
Chardan CapitalJul 31, 2026MaintainsBuy
Cantor FitzgeraldJul 29, 2026MaintainsOverweight
Canaccord GenuityJul 28, 2026InitiatesBuy
Evercore ISI GroupJul 22, 2026InitiatesOutperform

The case for and against

Updated Oct 21, 2026

Bull case

Tenax Therapeutics is viewed positively because its phase three focus on levosimendan targets pulmonary hypertension, a setting with high unmet need where even modest signals could matter clinically. Despite the uncertainty around the 6MWT result, the subgroup benefit in patients below the median baseline 6MWT, the -49% NT-proBNP reduction versus placebo, and the company’s planned Type C meeting suggest there may still be a viable path forward in sicker patients. The outlook also reflects disciplined valuation assumptions, including a DCF using an 11% WACC, lower probability of success, and reduced TAM and penetration, while the updated $40,000 annual WAC supports meaningful commercial upside if development progresses.

Bear case

Tenax Therapeutics is burdened by a weak clinical and regulatory profile, as the LEVEL phase III study missed its primary endpoint and key secondary endpoints, with 6MWD showing only a 3.5m treatment difference versus placebo at Week 12 and a p-value of 0.63. The failed Phase 2 HELP premise, coupled with uncertainty over whether the FDA will accept the two-trial path after the miss and the need for statistically significant data that clears a stringent threshold, makes approval materially harder to achieve. Even with IP protection into 2040, the stock faces meaningful downside from trial delays, possible regulatory disagreement, and competitive pressure from sotatercept and relaxin.

Information on this page is provided for informational purposes only and is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security. Investing involves risk, including possible loss of principal. Market data is delayed at least 15 minutes and is provided without warranty. Analyst ratings, price targets and company data come from third-party sources. Past performance does not guarantee future results.