Firefly Aerospace

FLY · NASDAQ

$16.31−$0.33 (−1.98%)TodayMarket closed ·
Prev close $16.64

FLY analyst rating

BuyConsensus of 10 analysts over the last 12 months. 70% rate it a buy.
  • Strong buy0
  • Buy7
  • Hold3
  • Underperform0
  • Sell0

12-month price target · 12 analysts

Average $39.21 (+140.4% upside)

Low
$25.25
Now
$16.31
High
$52.50

Upgrades and downgrades

The latest rating actions, newest first

FLY analyst upgrades, downgrades and rating actions
FirmDateActionRating
BarclaysOct 9, 2026InitiatesEqual-Weight
Roth CapitalAug 12, 2026MaintainsBuy
B. Riley SecuritiesAug 12, 2026MaintainsBuy
Cantor FitzgeraldAug 12, 2026MaintainsOverweight
Wells FargoJul 27, 2026InitiatesEqual-Weight
KeybancJun 15, 2026UpgradeSector Weight → Overweight
Morgan StanleyMay 5, 2026MaintainsEqual-Weight
Goldman SachsApr 20, 2026MaintainsNeutral
Roth CapitalApr 17, 2026MaintainsBuy
JefferiesApr 13, 2026MaintainsBuy

The case for and against

Updated Oct 16, 2026

Bull case

Firefly Aerospace is underpinned by exceptional 2Q26 execution, with revenue of $117.7m rising 45.5% q/q and 659% y/y, while spacecraft revenue grew 60% q/q and gross margin held at 20% despite launch timing noise. Its outlook is strengthened by $1.5bn of backlog, about 95% coverage of CY26 revenue guidance of $420m-$450m, and a broader mix of space, national security, and AI software programs that improve visibility and margin potential. Liquidity is also a major support, with roughly $635m of cash plus an undrawn $300m+ revolver, giving it room to execute through launch investments while scaling higher-margin spacecraft solutions.

Bear case

Firefly Aerospace is exposed to an emerging and highly competitive space market where customer wins, pricing, and mission demand can shift quickly, while its top five customers still represent over 86% of revenue and 81% of backlog, heightening concentration risk. The company also carries structural execution risk from launch delays, anomalies, harsh space-environment events, and manufacturing quality issues across Eclipse MLVs and Elytra OTVs, all of which could trigger regulatory holds, higher costs, or lost contracts. Fundamentally, a history of operating losses, rising operating expenses and capital expenditures, reliance on third-party launch providers and limited suppliers, and heavy dependence on U.S. government budgets and regulation weaken visibility into profitability and cash generation.

Information on this page is provided for informational purposes only and is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security. Investing involves risk, including possible loss of principal. Market data is delayed at least 15 minutes and is provided without warranty. Analyst ratings, price targets and company data come from third-party sources. Past performance does not guarantee future results.